I've considerably changed my focus on this page.

I want to focus on politics in the information age contemporary to a progressive view of reality itself, the government and the economy are interdependent. To this end, the e-Democratic ethos informs itself via a knowledge-based economics, and vice-versa. The governmental system is categorically flawed if knowledge does not serve as the economic basis.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E-democracy

The designation is called a "knowledge economy" by Marc Zuckerberg.

https://youtu.be/BUWmyGBEfVc - Mark Zuckerberg: 'I'm Pro-Knowledge Economy'

The use of positivism was explored in the early part of the last century with the original technocratic view.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technocracy



This includes the reasons for reservations coming from system compliments, including cognitive dissonance and biases. It is naive to approach informational constraints in confirming and not informing the economy.

Also, Big Data is capable of affirming the possibility of this dual system approach, and cliodynamically, the tertiary elements of a traditional technocracy.



https://youtu.be/Uk8x3V-sUgU - RSA Animate - The Internet in Society



Without these being used in conjunction, I argue, the the economy will not fulfill a rational goal. This kind of view goes into a deontological, not utilitarian, ethic. These serve to implement a metaphysics driven by empirical design. Without it the outcome is much like the Argentina experiment in democracy.

https://youtu.be/NXfYNdapq3Q - Pia Mancini: How to upgrade democracy

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The idea of redefining radicalism holds; however employed. But ethos - being the ingrained habitual beliefs of a culture - are more telling, IMO. Look at the comments and look for hate language if you need proof? The thing we should keep in mind. Rather than hate language would likely be admonishment of guilt. This is certainly a thing lacking proper context. So excluding rhetoric is sharp. But looking at Islam as a venerable place to start is going to be difficult. The ethos and the ethics are intertwined in such a way that there is little change until most people see race as a tool of oppression and religion its counterpart rebuttal. This scenario, of course, implies that the most recent of Abrahamic traditions is the least susceptible to technological progress. Doesn’t this mean defining "progress" to mean a thing done with respect to race; and not without religion or gender, or even platitudes, for fucks sake?!?  If progress is learning from mistakes and moving toward a c
Read more

The AI Analogy is Absurd.

Specifically,the analogy is absurd. The problem is not as much how absurd a situation can arise in ethical technology. There is an expectation on the part of the food to be less sentient in some way that makes their adamance or vehemence a capability exclusive to the diner and not so much to the dinner. Analogously, in the future can we expect people with cleft chins to report to soylent centers? Yet, that is expected by some ghetto youth if this is the soylent center is a prison and the skin is a minority? We may have little recourse but to become radically anti-radical. Thought Experiment. A quantum gel is eventually developed to serve as a nerve impulse router with a coordinating processor. The film is completely transparent and its members, its organs, and its qualia, are caches accessing memory devices and are facilitated by spooky actions enabled by quantum entanglements. This supercomputer would need to have superconductors as a backbone and a CPU which can predict human behavio
Read more

The Gordian Knot – Sweet Talk

Image
One of the key disputes in the continental vs analytic divide in modern philosophy is one of style. German and French philosophers largely follow Hegel’s impenetrable style—or worse, Heidegger’s—while English-speaking philosophers largely follow Bertrand Russell’s approachable prose. https://sweettalkconversation.com/2016/03/13/the-gordian-knot/
Read more